Abordaje abierto versus laparoscópico para la reconstitución del tránsito luego de la cirugía de Hartmann: resultados de una experiencia de 10 años / Open versus laparoscopic approach for Hartmann's reversal: results of a 10-year retrospective cohort study

Resumen Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados perioperatorios del abordaje abierto (AA) con el abordaje laparoscópico (AL) para la reconstitución de tránsito (RT), y determinar factores de riesgo asociados a morbilidad posoperatoria. Material y Métodos: Se estudiaron pacientes consecutivos sometidos a RT entre enero de 2007 y diciembre de 2016 en nuestro centro. Se excluyeron aquellos con grandes hernias incisionales que requirieran reparación abierta simultánea. Se consignaron variables demográficas y perioperatorias, y se compararon ambos grupos. Además, se realizó una regresión logística para la identificación de factores de riesgo asociados a morbilidad posoperatoria en la serie. Resultados: Se realizaron 101 RT en el período. Se excluyeron 14 casos por hernia incisional, por lo que se analizaron 87 casos (46 AA y 41 AL). Diez pacientes en el grupo AL (24,4%) requirieron conversión, principalmente por adherencias. La morbilidad total de la serie fue de 36,8%, siendo mayor en el AA (50% vs 21,9%, p = 0,007). Hubo una filtración anastomótica en cada grupo. La estadía posoperatoria fue de 5 (3-52) días para el AL y 7 (4-36) días para el AA (p < 0,001). En la regresión logística, sólo el AA fue un factor de riesgo independientemente asociado a morbilidad posoperatoria (OR 2,89, IC 95% 1,11-7,49; p = 0,029). Conclusión: El abordaje laparoscópico se asocia a menor morbilidad y estadía posoperatoria que el abordaje abierto para la reconstitución del tránsito pos-Hartmann. En nuestra serie, el abordaje abierto fue el único factor independientemente asociado a morbilidad posoperatoria.

Introduction: Hartmann's reversal (HR) is considered a technically demanding procedure and is associated with high morbidity rates. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative results of the open approach (OA) with the laparoscopic approach (LA) for HR, and to determine the risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity. Material and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing HR between January 2007 and December 2016 at a university hospital were included. Patients with large incisional hernias that required an open approach a priori were excluded from the analysis. Demographic and perioperative variables were recorded. Analytical statistics were carried out to compare both groups, and a logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity in the series. Results: A hundred and one HR were performed during the study period. Fourteen cases were excluded due to large incisional hernias, so 87 cases (46 OA and 41 LA) were analyzed. Ten patients in the LA group (24.4%) required conversion, mainly due to adhesions. The total morbidity of the series was 36.8%, being higher in the OA group (50% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.007). There was one case of anastomotic leakage in each group. The length of stay was 5 (3-52) days for LA and 7 (4-36) days for OA (p < 0.001). In the logistic regression, the OA was the only independent risk factor associated with postoperative morbidity in HR (OR 2.89, IC 95% 1.11-7.49; p = 0.029). Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach is associated with less morbidity and a shorter length of stay compared to the open approach for Hartmann's reversal. An open approach was the only factor independently associated with postoperative morbidity in our series.

Abordaje quirúrgico y evolución posoperatoria en reintervenciones de complicaciones en cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica, 15 años de experiencia / Surgical approach and postoperative clinical course in reinterventions for complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: 15 years of experience

Resumen Objetivo: Comparar tres abordajes quirúrgicos (abierto, laparoscópico y laparoscópico convertido) para el manejo de complicaciones posoperatorias en cirugía colorrectal electiva realizadas primariamente por vía laparoscópica. Materiales y Método: Este estudio de cohorte retrospectivo incluyó pacientes reoperados después de una cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica electiva, agrupándose según la vía de abordaje de reoperación: abierta (RVA), laparoscópica (RVL) y laparoscópica convertida (RVLC). Las variables estudiadas fueron: preoperatorias (edad, sexo, puntuación ASA, IMC, comorbilidades e historia quirúrgica); operatorias (causa de reoperación, latencia para reoperación, tiempo operatorio, cirugía realizada y causa de conversión); y posoperatorias (tránsito intestinal, días de hospitalización, días de UCI, complicaciones médicas, infección del sitio quirúrgico, evisceración, transfusión y mortalidad a los 30 días). Resultados: Sin diferencias significativas para las variables preoperatorias y operatorias. En cuanto a las variables posoperatorias, el grupo de reoperaciones por vía laparoscópica, tuvo menos días de hospitalización (p = 0,012), menos días de UCI (p = 0,001) y un tránsito intestinal más rápido para reaparición de gases, heces y retorno a dieta sólida (p = 0,008, p = 0,029, p = 0,030, respectivamente). No hubo diferencias significativas en la infección del sitio quirúrgico, la evisceración, las complicaciones médicas, la transfusión y la mortalidad. Discusión y Conclusión: Este estudio reveló una mejor evolución clínica posoperatoria en el grupo de reoperación laparoscópica, con menor estancia hospitalaria y en UCI, y reducción del íleo posoperatorio, sin aumento de la morbimortalidad. Por lo tanto, la reoperación laparoscópica en cirugía colorrectal podría ser el abordaje más adecuado en pacientes debidamente seleccionados.

Aim: To compare three approaches (laparoscopic, open, and conversion of laparoscopic approach) for the management of intra-abdominal surgical complications after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Materials and Method: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients who required reoperation due to an intra-abdominal surgical complication after initial elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Patients were grouped according to the reoperation approach-laparoscopic reoperation, laparoscopic reoperation that required conversion to open surgery, and open reoperation. Pre-operative variables (age, gender, ASA score, BMI, comorbidities, and surgical history), operative variables (cause of reoperation, latency for reoperation, operative time, surgery performed, and cause of conversion), and post-operative variables (intestinal transit, hospital days, ICU days, medical complications, surgical site infection, evisceration, transfusion and 30-day mortality), were compared between groups. Results: There were no significant differences between groups among the pre-operative and operative variables. In terms of post-operative variables, the laparoscopic reoperation group, had fewer hospital days (p = 0.012), fewer ICU days (p = 0.001), and faster intestinal transit regarding gas, stool and return to solid diet (p = 0.008, p = 0.029 and p = 0.030, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in surgical site infection, evisceration, medical complications, transfusion, and mortality. Discussion and Conclusión: This study revealed better post-operative clinical course in the laparoscopic reoperation group, with shorter hospital and ICU stay, and reduced postoperative ileus, without increased morbidity or mortality. Laparoscopic reoperation for complications after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery may therefore be the preferred approach.

C-reactive protein as a marker of postoperative complication of emergency colorectal surgery

Introduction: The literature converges regarding the use of C-reactive protein (CRP) tests between postoperative days (PODs) 3 and 5 of elective procedures. In this period, they have great sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for severe and anastomotic complications about two days before the first clinical sign. The few studies on colorectal urgency suggest that, despite the different initial values according to the surgical indication, following POD 3, the level of CRP is similar to that of elective procedures. However, given the heterogeneity of the studies, there is no consensus on the cutoff values for this use. Objective: To validate the use and propose a PO CRP cut-off value in urgent colorectal procedures as an exclusion criterion for complications of anastomosis or the abdominal cavity. Method: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 308 patients who underwent urgent colorectal surgical procedures between January 2017 and December 2019. The following data were considered: age, gender, surgical indication, type of procedure performed, complications, CRP levels preoperatively and from POD 1 to 4, and the severity of the complications. We compared the CRP levels and the percentage variations between the preoperative period and PODs 1 to 4 as markers of severe complications using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The levels of CRP on POD4, and their percentage drops between PODs 2 to 4 and PODs 3 to 4, were better to predict severe complications. A cutoff of 7.45mg/dL on POD 4 had 91.7% of sensitivity and NPV. A 50% drop between PODs 3 and 4 had 100% of sensitivity and NPV. Conclusion: Determining the level of CRP is useful to exclude severe complications, and it could be a criterion for hospital discharge in POD 4 of emergency colorectal surgery. (AU)

Effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a quasi-experimental intervention

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. Objective: This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of SSI in colorectal surgery. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study with reference to the introduction of a surgical care bundle in 2011. Our study population, made up of patients who underwent colorectal surgery, was divided into the following two periods: 2007-2011 (pre-intervention) and 2012-2017 (post-intervention). The intervention's effect on SSI incidence was analyzed using adjusted odds ratios (OR). Results: A total of 1,727 patients were included in the study. SSI incidence was 13.0% before versus 11.6% after implementation of the care bundle (OR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.17, p = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and emergency surgery were independently associated with SSI. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery proved to be a protective factor against SSI. Conclusions: Care bundles have proven to be very important in reducing SSI incidence since the measures that constitute these protocols are mutually reinforcing. In our study, the implementation of a care bundle reduced SSI incidence from 13% to 11.6%, though the reduction was not statistically significant.

¿Podemos prevenir la dehiscencia anastomótica en cirugía oncológica colorrectal mediante el empleo de la angiografía de fluorescencia con verde de indocianina? / Could we pevent anastomotic leak in colorectal oncological surgery by using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography?

Resumen Objetivo La dehiscencia anastomótica (DA) en cirugía colorrectal es una de las complicaciones más devastadoras. El empleo de la angiografía de fluorescencia con verde de indocianina, se ha introducido en este campo como una herramienta prometedora para reducir la incidencia de DA. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar en nuestro medio, los resultados de la introducción de esta técnica en cuanto a prevención de DA. Materiales y Método: Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo, incluyendo 59 pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal resectiva a los que se les realizó una evaluación mediante angiografía con verde de indocianina intraoperatoria de la vascularización anastomótica. Resultados: Tras la aplicación de la técnica, se modificó el punto de sección en 9 pacientes (15,25%); en los cuales no se registró ninguna DA. La tasa de complicaciones global fue de 35,59% (n = 21) objetivando 3 dehiscencias anastomóticas en la serie. Conclusión: Esta técnica se perfila como una estrategia adicional en la prevención de la aparición de DA. Serán necesarios estudios randomizados con inclusión de mayor número de pacientes para obtener resultados concluyentes.

Aim: Anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal surgery is one of the most devastating complication. The use of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography has been developed as a promising tool to reduce the incidence of AL. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of this technique on the prevention of AL. Materials and Method: A prospective study was carried out, including 59 patients undergoing resective colorectal surgery. It was performed intraoperatively indocyanine green angiography evaluation of the anastomotic perfusión in all of then. Results: The section point was modified in 9 patients (15.25%); in which no AL was registered. The overall complication rate was 35.59% (n = 21), founding 3 anastomotic dehiscences in the serie. Conclusion: In conclusion, in our experience this technique is an additional strategy in the prevention of the AL. Randomized control trial including more patients will be necessary to obtain conclusive results.

Seguridad y entrenamiento de las colonoscopias por cirujanos. Estudio multicéntrico / Safety and training of colonoscopies by surgeons. A multicenter study

RESUMEN Introducción: la seguridad de la colonoscopia realizada por cirujanos y el tratamiento de sus complica ciones han sido analizados aisladamente y en escasas publicaciones nacionales. Objetivos: el objetivo principal del estudio fue analizar las colonoscopias realizadas por cirujanos co lorrectales, sus complicaciones y resolución. El objetivo secundario fue comparar los resultados entre un hospital universitario y distintos centros del país dotados de cirujanos colorrectales que habían recibido entrenamiento en una residencia posbásica. Material y métodos: estudio multicéntrico, prospectivo a nivel nacional. Se incluyeron las colonosco pias realizadas entre 2011 y 2016 . Se analizaron como variables las complicaciones, edad, sexo, tipo de endoscopia, diagnóstico, tratamiento, sitio de realización y de entrenamiento del cirujano. Se ex presaron en promedios, porcentajes y rangos. El análisis estadístico consistió en el test exacto ordinal, relaciones y proporciones y exacto de Fisher. Se consideró significancia a p < 0,05. Resultados: de 24 907 procedimientos, 17 283 fueron diagnósticos y 17 202 provenían de centros del interior. Hubo 43 complicaciones (0,17%); 35 específicas: perforaciones (19), hemorragias (8), sín drome pospolipectomía (5) y técnicas (3), diagnosticadas y resueltas por el mismo equipo sin mor bimortalidad. No hubo diferencias en las complicaciones según el centro ni tipo de colonoscopia en incidencia o tratamiento. Todos los cirujanos se entrenaron en residencias de posgrado con programas de entrenamiento en colonoscopia. Conclusiones: existen similares resultados entre cirujanos provenientes de instituciones con residen cia posbásica y centros del interior al realizar colonoscopias. La colonoscopia realizada por cirujanos es un procedimiento seguro y posible de ser adquirido como competencia luego de un entrenamiento formal realizado en una residencia posbásica.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The safety of colonoscopies performed by surgeons and the management of their com plications has not been analyzed in depth in the low number of national publications. Objective: The primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the outcomes of colonoscopies perfor med by colorectal surgeons, in terms of complications. and their resolution. The secondary endpoint was to compare the results between a university hospital and different centers nationwide staffed with colorectal surgeons who had received formal training during a residency program in the surgical subspecialty. Material and methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective and consecutive national study. The colonscopies performed between 2011 and 2016 were included. The variables analyzed included complications, age, sex, type of endoscopy, diagnosis, treatment, location were the procedure was performed and surgeon's training. The results were expressed as mean, percentage and range. The statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 24,907 procedures were performed, 17,283 corresponded to diagnostic colonosco pies and 17,202 were made in provincial centers. Forty-four complications were recorded (0.17%), of which 35 were procedure-related complications: 19 perforations, 8 bleeding events, 5 post-polypec tomy syndromes and three related with the technique; all were diagnosed and solved by the same team without morbidity and mortality. There were no differences in the incidence of complications and how they were treated according to the center or type of colonoscopy. All the surgeons received colonoscopy training during a residency program in the surgical subspecialty. Conclusions: The results obtained in colonoscopies performed by surgeons trained in institutions with residency programs in surgical subspecialties are similar t Safe colonoscopies can be performed by surgeons who have been trained in institutions with a residency program in a surgical subspecialty and with a formal training program in colonoscopy.

Resultados de la implantación de un protocolo de corrección de anemia preoperatoria en la recuperación intensificada de cirugía colorrectal electiva / Results of the implantation of a protocol for correction of preoperative anemia in the intensified recovery of elective colorectal surgery

Resumen Introducción Los protocolo ERAS recomiendan la detección y optimización de la anemia preoperatoria. Objetivo Evaluar si la implantación de un protocolo de corrección de anemia preoperatoria en cirugía colorrectal electiva con un protocolo ERAS (grupo ERAS) reduce las transfusiones con respecto a un grupo de pacientes operado de la misma patología previo a su implantación (grupo preERAS). Objetivos secundarios Valorar estancia hospitalaria, complicaciones y reingresos a los 30 días tras el alta. Materiales y Método Comparamos los primeros 121 pacientes consecutivos que participaron en un protocolo ERAS con un protocolo corrección de anemia preoperatoria con los 135 previos a su implantación. Se consideraron resultados significativos p < 0,05. Resultados Se redujo el número de pacientes transfundidos en el grupo ERAS (31 (22,96%) vs 15 (12,4%), p = 0,028) y el número total de concentrados de hematíes transfundidos (3 ± 1,57 vs 1,8 ± 0,56, p < 0,001) con la aplicación del protocolo. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los pacientes que recibieron hierro oral, pero sí en los que recibieron hierro intravenoso (3 vs 31, p < 0,001). Se redujo la estancia hospitalaria (11 ± 3,8 vs 9,8 ± 3,7, p = 0,018), sin aumentar la tasa de complicaciones ni los reingresos a los 30 días. Conclusión La aplicación de un protocolo de optimización de anemia preoperatoria en pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva siguiendo las guías ERAS redujo el número total de pacientes transfundidos, el número de concentrados de hematíes trasfundidos y la estancia hospitalaria.

Introduction An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, recommends detection and optimization in treatment of preoperative anemia. Aim Evaluate if introducing a preoperative anemia correcting protocol in elective colorectal surgery, by means of an ERAS protocol (ERAS Group), reduces the need for transfusions with regards to a group of patients undergoing surgery for the same pathology before the protocol´s implementation (ERAS Group). Secondary objectives Evaluate length of stay, complications and readmission rates 30 days post discharge. Materials and Method We compared the first 121 consecutive patients who participated in an ERAS protocol with a preoperative correcting anemia protocol, with the previous 135 patients operated on before the protocol was introduced. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results The number of patients who needed a transfusion was reduced in the ERAS group (31 (22.96%) vs 15 (12.4%), p = 0.028) as was the total number of red blood cells transfused (3 ± 1.57 vs 1.8 ± 0.56, p < 0.001) with the use of the protocol. No statistical differences were noted in the patients who received oral iron although there was in those who received intravenous iron. (3 vs 31, p < 0.001). Overall length of stay was reduced (11 ± 3.8 vs 9.8 ± 3.7, p = 0.018), but no increase in complications or readmission rates at 30 days. Conclusions The implementation of an optimization in the treatment of preoperative anemia protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery following the ERAS guidelines, reduced the total number of patients who needed transfusions, the total concentrate of red blood cells transfused, and the length of stay.

Evaluación de factores de riesgo asociados a dehiscencia anastomótica en cirugía colorrectal: análisis multivariado de 748 pacientes / Evaluation of the risk factors associated with anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery: multivariate analysis of 748 pacients

INTRODUCCIÓN: La dehiscencia anastomótica (DA) es una complicación severa en cirugía colorrectal con una incidencia que oscila entre 2 y 19%. La literatura internacional muestra numerosos estudios sobre la identificación de factores de riesgo (FR), mientras que en la nacional existen solo dos series que analizan esta complicación. OBJETIVO: Realizar una caracterización descriptiva de resultados institucionales y establecer la tasa de DA, sus factores de riesgo asociados y la mortalidad. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: Serie de casos no concurrente, cuya muestra son pacientes consecutivos intervenidos de patología colorrectal con anastomosis primaria con o sin ostoma derivativo entre los años 2004 y 2016. Se realiza modelo de regresión logística univariable y multivariable. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron 748 pacientes, 50,5% mujeres, media de edad fue 56,2. Las indicaciones quirúrgicas más frecuentes fueron cáncer colorrectal en 381 (50,9%) pacientes y enfermedad diverticular en 163 (21,8%). La DA fue de 5,6% (42/748) y la mortalidad fue de 2% (15/748), siendo de 1% para los electivos (7/681). En el análisis univariado encontramos que los FR que tuvieron significancia estadística fueron la albúmina (p < 0,001), altura anastomosis (p < 0,001), transfusión (p < 0,001), localización (colon derecho > izquierdo) (p = 0,011), mientras que en el análisis multivariado fueron la albúmina (p = 0,002) con un OR 3,64 (IC 95% 1,58-8,35) y transfusión (p = 0,015) con un OR 7,15 (IC 95% 1,46-34,91). CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestra serie es la más grande reportada en Chile, con resultados similares a estudios internacionales y nacionales. Establecemos que la hipoalbuminemia y la presencia de transfusiones intraoperatorias se asocian a alta tasa de DA.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication in colorectal surgery, its incidence ranges from 2 to 19%. In international literature, we found numerous studies on the identification of risk factors (RF), while in the national there are only two series that analyze this complication. AIM: Perform a descriptive characterization of institutional results and establish the AL rate, its associated risk factors and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Non-concurrent series of cases, whose sample is consecutive patients operated for colorectal pathology with primary anastomosis with or without a derivative ostoma between 2004 and 2016. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression model was performed. RESULTS: There were 748 patients, 50.5% women, mean age was 56.2. The most frequent surgical indications were colorectal cancer in 381 (50.9%) patients and diverticular disease in 163 (21.8%). The AL was 5.6% (42/748) and the mortality was 2% (15/748), being 1% for the electives (7/681). In the univariate analysis, we found that the RF that had statistical significance were albumin (p < 0.001), anastomosis height (p < 0.001), transfusion (p < 0.001), location (right colon > left) (p = 0.011), while that in the multivariate analysis were albumin (p = 0.002) with an OR 3.64 (IC 95% 1.58-8.35) and transfusion (p = 0.015) with an OR 7.15 (IC 95% 1.46-34.91). CONLUSION: Our series is the largest reported in Chile, with similar results to international and national studies. We establish that hypoalbuminemia and the presence of intraoperative transfusions are associated with a high rate of AL.

Uso do Checklist de cirurgia segura da Organização Mundial da Saúde como estratégia de redução de complicações e mortalidade em cirurgias colorretais: uma análise de duas realidades, Brasil X Canadá / Using the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist as a strategy for reducing complications and mortality in colorectal surgery: a two-reality analysis, Brazil vs. Canada

Introdução: Os eventos adversos são responsáveis por um grande número de complicações, invalidez e morte em pacientes cirúrgicos. Estima-se que, anualmente, ocorram sete milhões de complicações em pacientes cirúrgicos e cerca de um milhão de mortes durante ou imediatamente após a cirurgia. Assim, a fim de minimizar a sua ocorrência, em 2008, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) lançou o desafio global "Cirurgias Seguras Salvam Vidas", visando promover a melhoria da qualidade do cuidado prestado a esses pacientes. O desafio propõe a aplicação de um checklist cirúrgico que contribui para despertar a equipe multiprofissional para ações simples, porém fundamentais dentro da complexidade do procedimento cirúrgico. Diante da proposta de implementação do checklist na melhoria da segurança do paciente cirúrgico, o presente estudo teve como questão norteadora: Qual é o impacto do checklist cirúrgico nas infecções do sítio cirúrgico (ISC), reinternação, reoperação e mortalidade no período de 30 dias em duas instituições de realidades distintas: Brasil e Canadá? Objetivo: Analisar o impacto da adoção do checklist cirúrgico nas infecções do sítio cirúrgico, reinternação, reoperação e mortalidade em cirurgias colorretais de duas instituições de realidades distintas: Brasil e Canadá. Métodos: Tratou-se de um estudo retrospectivo realizado em um hospital de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil e um hospital em Ottawa, Ontário, Canadá, ambos de grande porte, públicos e universitários. Este estudo respeitou a Resolução 466 de 2012 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde e foi parte de um projeto maior, tendo sido submetido e aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa no Brasil (037048/2017) e Canadá (REB # 20170449-01H). A coleta de dados foi feita por meio da revisão de prontuários acerca do preenchimento do checklist e registros de complicações como retorno não planejado à sala de cirurgia, reinternação, ISC e mortalidade até o trigésimo dia no pós-operatório de cirurgias colorretais, no período de janeiro de 2015 a julho 2017, em ambas as instituições hospitalares. Para avaliação do impacto da implementação do checklist cirúrgico foram também analisados os mesmos dados de pacientes no ano anterior à implementação do checklist, sendo estes pareados por sexo, idade, classificação ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists), potencial de contaminação da ferida operatória, tipo de cirurgia (eletiva ou urgência) e tempo de duração. Os resultados foram avaliados por instituição e comparados entre si. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente no programa Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) para Windows (versão 21.0), onde foram realizadas medidas de tendência central e dispersão; análise inferencial, teste paramétrico, Qui-Quadrado ou Exato de Fisher, para variáveis categóricas e t Student simples ou Mann-Whitney, para as variáveis numéricas contínuas. Resultados: Foram incluídos 518 prontuários no Brasil, sendo 171 (33%) no período anterior à implementação do checklist cirúrgico e 347 (67%) posterior à sua implementação; e 842 prontuários no Canadá, dos quais 177 (21%) corresponderam ao período anterior à implementação do checklist cirúrgico e 665 (79%) posterior a sua implementação. No que se refere à completude do checklist no Brasil, dos 347 checklists, 222 (64%) estavam completos e 125 (36%) incompletos. No Canadá, dos 665 prontuários avaliados com a presença do checklist, observou-se que 657 (98,8%) estavam completos e 8 (1,2%) incompletos. Quanto aos desfechos, no hospital do Brasil a taxa de ISC reduziu após a implementação do checklist de 17% para 14,4%, o número de reinternação também teve uma queda de 2,9% para 1,7%, enquanto o quantitativo de reoperações aumentou de 5,3% para 8,1% e os óbitos de 1,8% para 3,5%. No hospital canadense a taxa de ISC reduziu após a implementação do checklist de 27,7% para 25,9%, a reinternação aumentou de 6,8% para 8,1%, a reoperação reduziu de 5,6% para 4,8% e os óbitos de 1,7% para 0,9%. Mas em nenhuma das realidades esses desfechos foram estatisticamente significativos. Observou-se uma relação direta entre o aumento da incompletude do checklist e desenvolvimento de ISC no Brasil (p = 0,026). Conclusão: O presente estudo verificou que embora o checklist seja adotado com adaptações em diferentes cenários, a sua implementação não foi capaz de reduzir complicações e mortalidade cirúrgicas em cirurgias colorretais nas distintas realidades estudadas, conforme evidenciado pela OMS. Contudo, a associação significativa entre aumento de checklists incompletos e o desenvolvimento de ISC no Brasil e a ausência dessa relação no Canadá, permite inferir que o impacto do checklist pode ser maior em países em desenvolvimento, onde políticas para a segurança do paciente são frágeis e as estratégias multimodais de prevenção e controle de ISC são escassas, divergindo da realidade de países desenvolvidos. Entretanto, ainda é passível de questionamento se o potencial impacto dessa ferramenta nesses cenários seria permanente ou pontual, uma vez que apenas o checklist, sem o auxílio de outras medidas, pode não ter um efeito sustentado em longo prazo.(AU)

Introduction: Adverse events are responsible for a huge number of complications, disability, and death in surgical patients. It is estimated that, annually, happens seven million complications and that around one million dies during or immediately after surgery. In this sense, in order to minimize its occurrence, in 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a global challenge "Safe Surgery Saves Lives", aiming to improve quality of care given to these patients. The challenge proposed an application of a surgical checklist that contributes to awakening the multiprofessional team to simple actions, but essentials considering the complexity of the surgical procedure. Considering the proposal of checklist implementation in patient safety improvement, this study had the following guiding questions: What is the impact of adoption of surgical checklist on Surgical Site Infection (SSI), readmission, reoperation, and mortality in 30 days follow up in two facilities from different settings: Brazil and Canada? Aim: To analyze the impact of adoption of surgical safety checklist on the occurrence of SSI, readmission, reoperation, and mortality in colorectal surgeries of two institutions of different settings: Brazil and Canada. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in one hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil and one hospital in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, both large, public, and university hospitals. This study respected 466 Resolution 2012 of Brazilian National Health Council and it was part of a broader project, which was approved by the Brazilian Research Ethics Board (037048/2017) and Canadian Research Ethics Board (#20170449-01H). Data collection was done through chart review where checklist completion and complications as an unplanned return to the operating room, readmission, SSI and mortality up to thirtieth day in postoperative colorectal procedures were analyzed, from January 2015 to July 2017 in both institutions. To evaluate the impact of surgical checklist implementation also was analyzed the same data from patients in the year before checklists implementation, being these matched by sex, age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score, wound classification, type of surgery (elective or urgency), and duration of operation. The results were evaluated by institution and compared between them. Data was statistically analyzed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (version 21.0) where it was carried out measures of central tendency and dispersion; inferential analysis, nonparametric test, chi-square or Fisher exact test, for categorical variables, simple t Student or Mann-Whitney test, for continuous variables. Results: A total of 518 medical records were included in Brazil, of which 171 (33%) were in the period before the implementation of the surgical checklist and 347 (67%) after the implementation of the checklist; and 842 medical records in Canada, of which 177 (21%) corresponded to the period before the implementation of the surgical checklist and 665 (79%) after the implementation of the checklist. Regarding the completion of the checklist in Brazil, 222 (64%) were complete and 125 (36%) were incomplete. In Canada, of the 665 records evaluated with the presence of the checklist, it was observed that 657 (98.8%) were complete and 8 (1.2%) were incomplete. Regarding the outcomes, in Brazilian hospital the SSI rate decreased after the implementation of the checklist from 17% to 14.4%, and readmission also fell from 2.9% to 1.7%, the number of reoperations increased from 5.3 % to 8.1%, and deaths from 1.8% to 3.5%. In Canadian hospital the SSI rate reduced after the implementation of the checklist from 27.7% to 25.9%, readmission increased from 6.8% to 8.1%, reoperation decreased from 5.6% to 4.8%, and deaths from 1.7% to 0.9%. But in no setting the outcomes were statistically significant. It was observed a direct association between a high number of incomplete checklists and development of SSI in Brazil (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The present study verified that although the checklist has been adopted with adaptations in different scenarios, its implementation was not able to reduce surgical complications and mortality in colorectal surgeries in the distinct settings studied, as evidenced by the WHO. However, the significant association between the increase in incomplete checklists and the development of SSI in Brazil and the absence of such relationship in Canada suggests that the impact of the checklist may be greater in developing countries, where patient safety policies are fragile and multimodal strategies for SSI control and prevention are scarce, diverging from the reality of developed countries. However, it is still questionable whether the potential impact of this tool on these scenarios would be permanent or punctual, since the checklist only, without the aid of other measures, may not have a sustained long-term effect.(AU)

Factors related to the reduction of the risk of complications in colorectal surgery within perioperative care recommended by the acerto protocol / Fatores associados à redução do risco de complicações na cirurgia colorretal com cuidados peri-operatórios recomendados pelo projeto acerto

ABSTRACT Background: Perioperative care multimodal protocol significantly improve outcome in surgery. Aim: To investigate risk factors to various endpoints in patients submitted to elective colorectal operations under the ACERTO protocol. Methods: Cohort study analyzing through a logistic regression model able to assess independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality, patients submitted to elective open colon and/or rectum resection and primary anastomosis who were either exposed or non-exposed to demographic, clinical, and ACERTO interventions. Results: Two hundred thirty four patients were analyzed and submitted to 156 (66.7%) rectal and 78 (33.3%) colonic procedures. The length of hospital postoperative stay (LOS) ≥ 7 days was related to rectal surgery and high NNIS risk index; preoperative fasting ≤4 h (OR=0.250; CI95=0.114-0.551) and intravenous volume of crystalloid infused > 30ml/kg/day (OR=0.290; CI95=0.119-0.706). The risk of postoperative site infection (SSI) was approximately four times greater in malnourished; eight in rectal surgery and four in high NNIS index. The duration of preoperative fasting ≤4 h was a protective factor by reducing by 81.3% the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). An increased risk for anastomotic fistula was found in malnutrition, rectal surgery and high NNIS index. Conversely, preoperative fasting ≤4 h (OR=0.11; CI95=0.05-0.25; p<0.0001) decreased the risk of fistula. Factors associated with pneumonia-atelectasis were cancer and rectal surgery, while preoperative fasting ≤ 4 h (OR=0.10; CI95=0.04-0.24; p<0.0001) and intravenous crystalloid ≤ 30 ml/kg/day (OR=0.36; CI95=0.13-0.97, p=0.044) shown to decrease the risk. Mortality was lower with preoperative fasting ≤4 h and intravenous crystalloids infused ≤30 ml/kg/day. Conclusion: This study allows to conclude that rectal procedures, high NNIS index, preoperative fasting higher than 4 h and intravenous fluids greater than 30 ml/kg/day during the first 48 h after surgery are independent risk factors for: 1) prolonged LOS; 2) surgical site infection and anastomotic fistula associated with malnutrition; 3) postoperative pneumonia-atelectasis; and 4) postoperative mortality.

RESUMO Racional: Protocolos multimodais de cuidados perioperatórios melhoram significativamente resultados na cirurgia. Objetivo: Investigar fatores de risco para vários desfechos clínicos em pacientes submetidos às operações colorretais eletivas com o emprego do protocolo ACERTO. Métodos: Coorte analisando indivíduos expostos ou não expostos às variáveis de risco demográficas, clínicas e intervenções ACERTO, através de um modelo de regressão logística, determinando fatores independentes de risco para morbidade e mortalidade. Resultados: Duzentos e trinta e quatro pacientes foram submetidos a 156 (66,7%) operações retais e 78 (33,3%) colônicas. Mantiveram relação com tempo de internação ≥7 dias operação retal e escore NNIS alto; jejum pré-operatório > 4h e volume de cristalóides >30 ml/kg/dia. O risco de infecção de sítio cirúrgico foi aproximadamente quatro vezes maior em desnutridos; oito em operações retais; e quatro com NNIS alto. Tempo de jejum pré-operatório ≤4 h reduziu em 81,3% o risco de infecção de sitio cirúrgico. Risco aumentado para fístula ocorreu em desnutridos, operação retal e escore NNIS elevado. Tempo de jejum pré-operatório ≤4 h constituiu fator de proteção para ocorrência de fístulas. Os fatores associados à pneumonia/atelectasia foram câncer e operação retal, enquanto que tempo de jejum pré-operatório ≤4 h e volume de cristalóides intravenoso ≤30 ml/kg/dia foram fatores de proteção. Mortalidade foi menor com jejum ≤4 h e fluidos endovenosos ≤30 ml/kg/dia. Conclusão: Este estudo permite concluir que operações retais, presença de fator de risco NNIS, tempo de jejum pré-operatório superior a 4 h e fluidoterapia com cristaloides endovenosos superior a 30 ml/kg/dia nas primeiras 48 h de pós-operatório constituem-se em fatores de risco independentes e aplicáveis para: 1) tempo de internação pós-operatória prolongada; 2) para infecção do sítio cirúrgico e fístula anastomótica associadas à desnutrição; 3) para pneumonia/atelectasia no pós-operatório; e 4) para mortalidade pós-operatória.

Variación de la temperatura central durante la cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica / Cangas in central temperature during laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Introducción: La hipotermia es una complicación que se produce con frecuencia en el posoperatorio de la cirugía laparoscópica. Múltiples factores potencian la disminución de la temperatura corporal por efecto directo del gas. Objetivo: Determinar las variaciones de la temperatura corporal en la intervención colorrectal laparoscópica y su influencia en la hipotermia intraoperatoria. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y prospectivo en pacientes con anestesia general para procedimiento laparoscópico colorrectal electivo con el propósito de identificar la incidencia y variaciones de la temperatura corporal. El estudio se realizó en el hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras entre enero de 2014 y enero de 2017. Resultados: De los 88 pacientes, 78,4 por ciento tenían entre 51 y 60 años. El sexo masculino, los pacientes con sobrepeso y la clasificación ASA II presentaron mayor frecuencia. La temperatura basal media fue de 36,4 oC. Luego de 30 min disminuyó a 35,5 oC, a la hora 35,4 oC, a 90 min 35,1 oC y al finalizar 34,9 oC. Del total, presentaron hipotermia intraoperatoria no intencionada 78,4 por ciento. En ninguno se constató hipotermia severa. El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 183,1 min. Se verificaron 49 complicaciones asociadas a hipotermia. Conclusiones: Se identificaron las variaciones de la temperatura corporal en la intervención colorrectal laparoscópica y la tendencia de generar hipotermia durante el procedimiento quirúrgico(AU)

Introduction: Hypothermia is a complication that frequently occurs in the postoperative period of laparoscopic surgery. Multiple factors boost the decrease in body temperature due to the direct effect of gas. Objective: To determine the variations in body temperature in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and its influence on intraoperative hypothermia. Methods: A descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was carried out with patients, using general anesthesia for elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures and with the purpose of identifying the incidence and variations of body temperature. The study was carried out at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital, between January 2014 and January 2017. Results: Among the 88 patients, 78.4 percent were at ages 51-60 years. Male sex, overweight patients and ASA-II classification were more frequent. The average basal temperature was 36.4ºC. After 30 min, it decreased to 35.5ºC; after one hour, to 35.4 ºC; after 90 min, 35.1ºC; and at the end, to 34.9 ºC. From the total, 78.4 percent presented unintentional intraoperative hypothermia. None of them had severe hypothermia. The average surgical time was 183.1 min. There were 49 complications associated with hypothermia. Conclusions: Variations in body temperature were identified in the laparoscopic colorectal intervention, as well as the tendency to generate hypothermia during the surgical procedure(AU)

Impacto de las filtraciones anastomóticas en cirugía colorrectal / Impact of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery

Introducción: La filtración de anastomosis es una de las complicaciones de mayor impacto en cirugía colorrectal. Objetivo: Analizar la frecuencia e impacto de las filtraciones anastomóticas en cirugía laparoscópica colorrectal. Material y método: Estudio longitudinal de base de datos prospectiva de pacientes operados por cirugía colorrectal entre julio de 2007 y agosto de 2014. Resultados: De un total de 654 pacientes operados, 52,3% correspondían a hombres con una edad promedio de 57 años (42-72). La indicación más frecuente fue cáncer colorrectal con 244 pacientes, 159 (24,3%) operados por cáncer de colon y 85 (12,9%) por cáncer de recto, seguido por la enfermedad diverticular con 239 pacientes (36,5%) y 171 pacientes (26,1%) con otros diagnósticos. En 44 pacientes (6,7%) se objetivó filtración anastomótica, con una mediana de 4 días desde el postoperatorio para su diagnóstico. Como factores asociados a filtración se identificó al género masculino, riesgo anestesiológico según ASA, necesidad de conversión a laparotomía y la anastomosis ileoanal. En relación con el tratamiento, 15 pacientes (33,7%) fueron tratados de forma médica exitosa y 29 fue necesario reintervenirlos, de los cuales 23 (79,3%) requirieron una ostomía de protección. No hubo mortalidad asociada a la cirugía, y el promedio de hospitalización en los pacientes con filtración fue de 12 vs. 5 días para los pacientes sin filtración de la anastomosis. Conclusión: Este trabajo permite identificar a grupos de pacientes con mayor riesgo de filtraciones anastomóticas, quienes duplican su estadía hospitalaria y en un alto porcentaje deben ser reintervenidos. La sospecha y diagnostico precoz reducen la morbimortalidad.

Introduction: Anastomotic leak is the most important complication on colorectal surgery. Objective: Analyze the frequency and impact of anastomotic leaks in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Material and methods: Longitudinal study of prospective database of patients undergoing colorectal surgery between July 2007 and August 2014. Results: 654 patients operated, 52.3% were men with an average age of 57 years (42-72). The most frequent indication was colorectal cancer in 244 patients, 159 (24.3%) operated for colon cancer and 85 (12.9%) for rectal cancer followed by diverticular disease in 239 patients (36.5%) and 171 patients (26.1%) with other diagnoses. In 44 patients (6.7%) anastomotic leakage was observed with a median of 4 days post surgery for diagnosis. As factors associated with filtration, we identified male gender, anesthesic risk according to ASA, need for conversion to laparotomy and ileoanal anastomosis. With regard to treatment, 15 (33.7%) were successfully treated with medical therapy alone and 29 required re-intervention, of which 23 (79.3%) required an ostomy protection. There was no mortality associated with surgery and average LOS was 12 vs. 5 days in patients with filtration compared with patients without anastomotic leakeage. Conclusion: This serie helps to identify patients groups with increased risk of anastomotic leakage who double their hospital LOS and in a higher percentage should need re-intervention. Suspicion and early diagnosis reduces morbidity and mortality.

Tasa de reingreso no programado en cirugía colorrectal electiva / Hospital readmission rates in complex colorrectal surgery

Background: Non programmed hospital readmission rates are a quality indicator of colorectal surgery. Aim: To analyze the causes of readmission of patients subjected to surgical procedures including intestinal anastomoses. Material and Methods: Analysis of a database of patients subjected to elective intestinal anastomoses in a period of 10 years. All non-programmed readmissions that occurred within 30 days after patient discharge were analyzed. Results: Overall non-programmed readmission rate was 7 percent and it was due to medical causes in 55 percent of patients. Nine percent of readmitted patients required a new surgical intervention. The figure among patients readmitted due to surgical causes, was 20 percent. Sixty one percent of patients were admitted at less than six days after discharge and 84 percent at less than 10 days. A non-programmed readmission duplicated the total hospitalization lapse and triplicated the rates of new surgical procedures. Conclusions: In this series of patients, the only predictor of a non-programmed readmission was the need for reoperation during the first admission.

Antecedentes: La readmisión no programada de un paciente operado es un evento frecuente en la práctica quirúrgica y se considera un indicador de calidad de la atención. El objetivo de este estudio es revisar las causas relevantes de reingreso en nuestro medio, establecer una tasa (TR) que permita una comparación prospectiva de los resultados y, eventualmente, identificar factores de riesgo modificables. Pacientes y Método: Se incluyen todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía mayor electiva con una anastomosis intestinal en un período de 10 años. Se define como readmisión la re-hospitalización no planificada en el período de 30 días a contar del alta del paciente categorizada como causa médica o quirúrgica. Para el análisis estadístico se empleó el test de regresión logística. Resultados: La TR en la serie fue 7 por ciento (56/791), el 55 por ciento son por causa médica. La tasa de re-operación global durante el reingreso fue 9 por ciento (5/56), cifra que se eleva al 20 por ciento (5/25) en el grupo con alguna causa quirúrgica de re-admisión. El 61 por ciento de los pacientes reingresan antes de los 6 días del egreso y el 84 por ciento antes de los diez días. Un reingreso no planificado duplica el tiempo total de hospitalización (9 vs 19 días; p = 0,001) y casi triplica la tasa de reoperación (p = 0,001). Conclusión: En nuestra serie el único factor de riesgo de un reingreso fue el antecedente de una reoperación durante la cirugía índice. La TR es un indicador complejo y los factores predictivos de una re-hospitalización son motivo de controversia.

Risk of postoperative deep venous thrombosis in patients with colorectal cancer treated with open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Whether the incidence rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery the same or not were under the debated without conclusion. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of DVT after laparoscopic or open colorectal cancer surgery by meta‑analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The open published articles comparing the incidence of DVT after laparoscopic or open colorectal cancer were collected in the data bases of Medline, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials and CNKI. The relative risk (RR) was pooled by using random or fixed effect mode to evaluate the incidence of DVT between laparoscopic or open colorectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: After searching the databases, 9 randomized clinical studies with 2606 colorectal cancer cases were included in this meta‑analysis. The mean operation time was 201.8 ± 17.28 min with its range of 180.0–224.4 min in the laparoscopic surgery group and 148.1 ± 18.8 min with its range of 135.0–184.0 min in the open surgery group. The operation time for laparoscopic surgery group were significant lower than in the open surgery group (P < 0.05). The RR of DVT between the laparoscopy and open surgery groups was 0.71 with its 95% confidence interval of 0.35–1.45 (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The operation time in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery was statistical longer than in the open colorectal cancer surgery, but the DVT risk of the two surgery approach was not different according to this meta‑analysis.

The Impact of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) based on the occurrence of anastomosis leakage, surgical site infection (SSI), and severity of surgical complication when performing elective colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MBP and non-MBP patients were matched using propensity score. The outcomes were evaluated according to tumor location such as right- (n=84) and left-sided colon (n=50) and rectum (n=100). In the non-MBP group, patients with right-sided colon cancer did not receive any preparation, and patients with both left-sided colon and rectal cancers were given one rectal enema before surgery. RESULTS: In the right-sided colon surgery, there was no anastomosis leakage. SSI occurred in 2 (4.8%) and 4 patients (9.5%) in the non-MBP and MBP groups, respectively. In the left-sided colon cancer surgery, there was one anastomosis leakage (4.0%) in each group. SSI occurred in none in the rectal enema group and in 2 patients (8.0%) in the MBP group. In the rectal cancer surgery, there were 5 anastomosis leakages (10.0%) in the rectal enema group and 2 (4.0%) in the MBP group. SSI occurred in 3 patients (6.0%) in each groups. Severe surgical complications (Grade III, IV, or V) based on Dindo-Clavien classification, occurred in 7 patients (14.0%) in the rectal enema group and 1 patient (2.0%) in the MBP group (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Right- and left-sided colon cancer surgery can be performed safely without MBP. In rectal cancer surgery, rectal enema only before surgery seems to be dangerous because of the higher rate of severe postoperative complications.

Factores asociados a morbilidad precoz en cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica / Factors associated with early morbidity in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Introduction: different factors have been associated with increased risk of complications in laparosco-pic colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to identify these factors in our series. Method: retrospective cohort. All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery between january 2000 and june 2012 were included. Patients who had postoperative complications until 30 days postoperatively were identified and analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. A p value less than 0.2 was used was used as a criteria for entry into the multivariate model. Results: the series consists of 848 patients with a median age of 58 +/- 22 years. Main surgical indications were: neoplasia (42.3 percent), diverticular disease (27.8 percent) and inflammatory bowel disease (8.8 percent). Most frecuently-performed procedures were: sigmoidectomy (39.5 percent), anterior resection of the rectum (13.4 percent), right hemicolectomy (13 percent) and total colectomy (8.7 percent). On univariate analysis, factors associated with complications were age over 75 years (OR 1.82, 95 percent CI 1.02 to 3.25) and red blood cell transfusion (OR 8.47, 95 percent CI 3.69 to 19.43). On multivariate analysis, red blood cell transfusion (OR 7.9 95 percent CI 1.78 to 35.88) and ASA III or IV (OR 3.26 95 percent CI 1.01 to 17.23) were independent factors associated with postoperative complications. Conclusion: intraoperative red blood cell transfusion and ASA score III or IV are independent risk factors associated with complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Introducción: se han descrito factores que se asocian a mayor riesgo de complicaciones en cirugía laparoscópica colorrectal. El objetivo de este trabajo es identificar estos factores en nuestra serie. Método: cohorte histórica. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica entre enero de 2000 y junio de 2012. Se identificaron los pacientes que tuvieron complicaciones post operatorias hasta 30 días después de la operación. Se analizaron mediante regresión logística uni y multivariada. Se utilizó como criterio de entrada al modelo multivariado los p < 0,2 y como criterio de significancia un p = 0,05. Resultados: la serie consta de 848 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 58 +/- 22 años. Las principales indicaciones operatorias fueron: neoplasia (42,3 por ciento), enfermedad diverticular (27,8 por ciento) y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (8,8 por ciento). Las operaciones realizadas con mayor frecuencia fueron: sigmoidectomía (39,5 por ciento), resección anterior de recto (13,4 por ciento), hemicolectomía derecha (13 por ciento) y colectomía total (8,7 por ciento). En el análisis univariado, los factores asociados a complicación fueron: la edad sobre 75 años (OR de 1,82; IC 95 por ciento 1,02-3,25) y la transfusión de glóbulos rojos (OR 8,47; IC 95 por ciento 3,69-19,43). En el análisis multivariado, la transfusión de glóbulos rojos (OR 7,9 95 por ciento IC 1,78-35,88) y el ASA III o IV (OR 3,26 95 por ciento IC 1,01-17,23) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de complicaciones en el postoperatorio. Conclusión: la necesidad de transfusión y el ASA III o IV son factores de riesgo independientes asociados a complicaciones en cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica.

Complicaciones intraabdominales de la cirugía colorrectal / Intra-abdominal complication of colorectal surgery

Las complicaciones intraabdominales de la cirugía colorrectal constituyen aún hoy un desafío para todo cirujano. Durante el desarrollo del Relato son evaluadas las distintas alternativas diagnósticas y terapéuticas para resolución de las mismas con sus variantes técnicas. Se pone énfasis en su prevención, elemento relevante para lograr la disminución de su incidencia. El aporte de la cirugía miniinvasiva ha modificado conductas, tácticas y tratamientos, con resultados actuales similares a los procedimientos convencionales. Este tipo de cirugía debe ser encarado por equipos entrenados, especializados y con infraestructura acorde a la complejidad de la patología a tratar.

Intra-abdominal complications of colorectal surgery are a challenge for every surgeon. During the development of this lecture several diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives are evaluated to resolve them with several and different techniques. The emphasis is on prevention to achieve minimal incidence. The contribution of minimally invasive surgery has changed behavior, tactics and treatments, with current results, similar to conventional procedures. This sort of surgery must be performed by trained, specialized teams with adequate infraestucture according the complexity of the disease.

Opciones terapéuticas en el cáncer de recto inferior / Terapeutic options in low rectal cancer

El tratamiento del cáncer de recto inferior ha evolucionado desde la cirugía al tratamiento multidisciplinario. Presenta todavía controversias. En esta revisión se ha investigado la patología, método de diagnóstico y tratamientos, mostrando finalmente la experiencia de nuestro Servicio. Concluimos manifestando que el futuro se encuentra en los adelantos en el diagnóstico para estadificar esta patología, aplicando luego el tratamiento adecuado a cada paciente.

Low rectal cancer treatment has changed from surgery to a multidisciplinary approach. There are still discussions about it. On this review, we have researched the pathology, diagnostic methods, and treatments. It also shows at the end, our surgical services experience. Finally, we make the comment that the future depends on the improvement of staging diagnostic in order to offer the proper patient treatment.

Prevenção e tratamento das complicações em operações colorretais / Prevention and treatment of complications in colorectal operations

As operações sobre o cólon e reto têm particularidades relacionadas às características clínicas dos doentes, às afecções intestinais e à flora bacteriana local exuberante. O presente artigo destina-se a revisar e discutir as medidas de prevenção e tratamento das complicações mais comuns após a realização de procedimentos colorretais, destacando aspectos importantes sobre o adequado preparo pré-operatório, emprego racional de antibioticoterapia, técnica cirúrgica apurada e na evolução pós-operatória. São discutidos as causas e o manuseio de complicações infecciosas, da obstrução intestinal, de complicações hemorrágicas, lesões iatrogênicas e complicações relacionadas aos estomas.

Leakage of colorectal anastomosis: experience at Civil Hospital, Karachi

To determine the frequency and outcome of leakage of Colorectal anastomosis. A descriptive study from Jan. 1997 to Dec. 2003. Surgical Unit I and V of Civil Hospital, Karachi. One hundred and sixty four patients admitted with colorectal cancer, colon or rectal injury and those admitted for restorative procedures were included in the study. Detailed history, physical examination and relevant investigation were carried out. Patients were operated by a senior surgeon. Patients were closely monitored after surgery for clinical signs of anastomotic leakage. CT scan was performed on the 10th postoperative day to ascertain the integrity of the anastomosis. Colonic anastomosis was done in 118 cases with an anastomotic leak of 3.4%, while rectal anastomosis was done in 28 patients with an anastomotic leak of 17.8% and a mortality of 10.7%. In most patients the average hospital stay after operation was 14 days. The overall anastomotic leak was 6.09% and mortality 2.4%. Colorectal anastomotic leakage is a serious complication. A high index of suspicion is required. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial in obtaining optimal results